CHINNAPPA NAICKER vs MADASAMY AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHUNMUGAIAH.K — 100011/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS070001152014
Filing Number
100011/2014
Filing Date
22-01-2014
Registration No
100011/2014
Registration Date
22-01-2014
Court
Sub Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHINNAPPA NAICKER
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A, RAVISANKAR.A
Respondent(s)
MADASAMY AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHUNMUGAIAH.K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary In this Tamil land dispute case (O.S. No. 11/2014), the Subordinate Judge of Sankarankovil rejected the plaintiff's claim for relief regarding property boundaries and title issues. The court found the plaintiff's testimony regarding the chain of ownership through documents (P.W.S.A.1, 2, and 3) and property demarcation to be unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding discrepancies in property measurements and the plaintiff's conflicting statements about the property's condition and boundaries. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues in establishing clear ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Tamil land dispute case (O.S. No. 11/2014), the Subordinate Judge of Sankarankovil rejected the plaintiff's claim for relief regarding property boundaries and title issues. The court found the plaintiff's testimony regarding the chain of ownership through documents (P.W.S.A.1, 2, and 3) and property demarcation to be unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding discrepancies in property measurements and the plaintiff's conflicting statements about the property's condition and boundaries. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues in establishing clear ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts