MEENA vs MADASAMY AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHANMUGIAH.K — 100013/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS070001112014
Filing Number
100013/2014
Filing Date
22-01-2014
Registration No
100013/2014
Registration Date
22-01-2014
Court
Sub Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEENA
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Respondent(s)
MADASAMY AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHANMUGIAH.K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 13/2014 | Date: 09.01.2026 | Court: Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil The court rejected the defendant's claims regarding property ownership and title. The defendant failed to produce original documents and contradicted himself on critical issues such as the property's boundaries, the chain of ownership, and when he obtained the deed. The court found his testimony unreliable, particularly regarding discrepancies between successive deeds and his inconsistent statements about the property's features and demarcation, ultimately ruling against him and granting relief to the plaintiff as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 13/2014 | Date: 09.01.2026 | Court: Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil The court rejected the defendant's claims regarding property ownership and title. The defendant failed to produce original documents and contradicted himself on critical issues such as the property's boundaries, the chain of ownership, and when he obtained the deed. The court found his testimony unreliable, particularly regarding discrepancies between successive deeds and his inconsistent statements about the property's features and demarcation, ultimately ruling against him and granting relief to the plaintiff as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts