KARUPPASAMY AND ANOTHER vs RATHINAM AND 7 OTHERS Advocate - PARAMASIVAN.G — 100035/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS070000902018

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

89/2018

Filing Date

05-03-2018

Registration No

100035/2018

Registration Date

05-03-2018

Court

Sub Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

KARUPPASAMY AND ANOTHER

Adv. SUBBIAH.R.S

AYYANAR

Respondent(s)

RATHINAM AND 7 OTHERS Advocate - PARAMASIVAN.G

PERIYA ERULAPPAN

Adv. KARUPPASAMY.S

CHINNA ERULAPPAN

Adv. KARUPPASAMY.S

SOLAI

Adv. KARUPPASAMY.S

ARUMUGAM

Adv. KARUPPASAMY.S

AYYANAR

Adv. KARUPPASAMY.S

TAMILNADU GOVERNMENT DISTRICT COLLECTOR

TAHSILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

05-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

11-02-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

27-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

17-11-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 35/2018 Date: 17.11.2025 This is a cross-examination testimony in a land dispute case involving Survey No. 374/1-A, which was subdivided into 374/1-A1, 374/1-A2, and 374/1-A3. The plaintiff claims entitlement to 1 acre 37 cents of the subdivided property based on ancestral inheritance through his father Adinamilagi. The case involves complex issues of property ownership, subdivision records, and competing claims by multiple defendants regarding possession and rights over the disputed land parcels. The court has adjourned the cross-examination for defendants 7 and 8 to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 35/2018 Date: 17.11.2025 This is a cross-examination testimony in a land dispute case involving Survey No. 374/1-A, which was subdivided into 374/1-A1, 374/1-A2, and 374/1-A3. The plaintiff claims entitlement to 1 acre 37 cents of the subdivided property based on ancestral inheritance through his father Adinamilagi. The case involves complex issues of property ownership, subdivision records, and competing claims by multiple defendants regarding possession and rights over the disputed land parcels. The court has adjourned the cross-examination for defendants 7 and 8 to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Sankarankovil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case