Nesamani and 6 others vs Poosaikili Advocate - CHOCKALINGAM.S.D. — 203/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060007442024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
203/2024
Filing Date
21-09-2022
Registration No
203/2024
Registration Date
21-09-2022
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nesamani and 6 others
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Selva sundari
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Susila
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Prema
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Rajan
Minor.Indhumathi
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Minor.Nivetha
Adv. Mr.O.Sivasailanathan
Respondent(s)
Poosaikili Advocate - CHOCKALINGAM.S.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Additional District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order (O.S. No. 203/2024) dated 30.10.2025 from the Tenkasi District Court. The document contains the cross-examination testimony of Defendant (DW1) in a civil suit involving a property dispute relating to temple lands. The defendant provides testimony regarding property ownership, family relationships, and claims concerning temple property records. The judge (K.N. Guru, Additional District Judge) affirms the witness's statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the deposition concludes with observations on the credibility and admissibility of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order (O.S. No. 203/2024) dated 30.10.2025 from the Tenkasi District Court. The document contains the cross-examination testimony of Defendant (DW1) in a civil suit involving a property dispute relating to temple lands. The defendant provides testimony regarding property ownership, family relationships, and claims concerning temple property records. The judge (K.N. Guru, Additional District Judge) affirms the witness's statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the deposition concludes with observations on the credibility and admissibility of the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts