Savariammal and 3 others vs Pathuvaililly and 4 others Advocate - CHOCKALINGAM.S.D. — 208/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060005762024
Filing Number
208/2024
Filing Date
23-Dec-2022
Registration No
208/2024
Registration Date
23-Dec-2022
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Savariammal and 3 others
Adv. P.Ramesh
-
2.Jesintha
-
3.Susanna
-
4.Jasmine Sabeena
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pathuvaililly and 4 others Advocate - CHOCKALINGAM.S.D.
-
2.Xavier
Adv. CHOCKALINGAM.S.D.
-
3.Sesurajan
Adv. CHOCKALINGAM.S.D.
-
4.Jeyaseelan
Adv. CHOCKALINGAM.S.D.
-
5.Manjula
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
08-Jun-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 208/2024) heard on 09.03.2026 before the Principal District Judge (FAC) at Nagercoil, involving a property dispute between petitioners Savariammal and others against respondent Pathuvaililly and others. The case concerns contested land boundaries, right of way, and construction on a disputed site known as "Dasil Poathu," with disputes over who has rightful access and maintenance responsibilities for the property. The court admitted the defendant's (DW1 - Sesurajan) cross-examination testimony in Tamil, addressing issues of property ownership, construction timelines, boundary walls, and easement rights across the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Restored
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jul-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Disposed
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Jun-2025
For further Proceedings
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Apr-2025
For further Proceedings
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2025
For further Proceedings
Additional District Munsif
-
08-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
29-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Aug-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Aug-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2024
This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 208/2024) heard on 09.03.2026 before the Principal District Judge (FAC) at Nagercoil, involving a property dispute between petitioners Savariammal and others against respondent Pathuvaililly and others. The case concerns contested land boundaries, right of way, and construction on a disputed site known as "Dasil Poathu," with disputes over who has rightful access and maintenance responsibilities for the property. The court admitted the defendant's (DW1 - Sesurajan) cross-examination testimony in Tamil, addressing issues of property ownership, construction timelines, boundary walls, and easement rights across the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts