G.Thamaraivalli and another vs Tenkasi District Through its Districst Collector another Advocate - Tr.M.Navaneetha krishna kannan — 321/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS060004822024

Filing Number

321/2021

Filing Date

24-Sep-2021

Registration No

321/2021

Registration Date

28-Sep-2021

Court

Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

7-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Thamaraivalli and another

    Adv. S.Mohanakrishnan

  2. 2.Ganesan

    Adv. S.Mohanakrishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tenkasi District Through its Districst Collector another Advocate - Tr.M.Navaneetha krishna kannan

  2. 2.Tenkasi Taluk through its Tahsildar

    Adv. Tr.M.Navaneetha krishna kannan

  3. 3.T.Navan Santhanamuthu

    Adv. Tr.E.S. Kailasam

  4. 4.T.Nadarkannu

    Adv. Tr.E.S. Kailasam

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2021 Date: 23.01.2026 This is a property dispute case involving land ownership claims in Tenkasi District. Witness Ganesan's cross-examination testimony reveals disputes over property succession and registration. The court examined conflicting claims regarding ancestral property acquisition in 1932, property division among heirs, and discrepancies in land survey records and revenue documents. Key issues included whether certain survey numbers belonged to the petitioner's family and disputes over land registration in various names. The judge (Additional District Judge K.N. Guru) recorded detailed testimony addressing property boundaries, heir succession, and documentation validity, ultimately addressing the substantive ownership claims in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  17. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  19. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  23. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 06-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  25. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 30-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 28-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 24-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 15-Oct-2025

    Restored

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  33. 24-Jul-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  34. 24-Jul-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  35. 24-Jul-2025

    Disposed

    Additional District Munsif

  36. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  37. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  38. 09-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  39. 09-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  40. 04-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  41. 26-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  42. 21-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  43. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  44. 03-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  45. 26-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  46. 07-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  47. 09-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  48. 11-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  49. 04-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  50. 26-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  51. 05-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  52. 12-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 24-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2021 Date: 23.01.2026 This is a property dispute case involving land ownership claims in Tenkasi District. Witness Ganesan's cross-examination testimony reveals disputes over property succession and registration. The court examined conflicting claims regarding ancestral property acquisition in 1932, property division among heirs, and discrepancies in land survey records and revenue documents. Key issues included whether certain survey numbers belonged to the petitioner's family and disputes over land registration in various names. The judge (Additional District Judge K.N. Guru) recorded detailed testimony addressing property boundaries, heir succession, and documentation validity, ultimately addressing the substantive ownership claims in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case