Vellaiya Nadar (Died) (through his Power agent Murugan) vs Poosaidurai Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN — 400466/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25a. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060001422015
Filing Number
400466/2015
Filing Date
16-Oct-2015
Registration No
400466/2015
Registration Date
16-Oct-2015
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vellaiya Nadar (Died) (through his Power agent Murugan)
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
-
2.Gomathikani
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
-
3.Eswari
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
-
4.Karuppasamy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Poosaidurai Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN
-
2.Pathirakali
-
3.Sivaraman
-
4.Dhanalakshmi
-
5.Logeshwari
Case History
-
16-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Feb-2026
Batta
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2026
Steps
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Steps
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Jan-2026
Steps
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2026
Steps
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2025
Amendment
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Restored
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Apr-2021
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary Case: O.S. 466/15 (Original Suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession) Court: Kancheepuram District Court, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 09.04.2021 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the property is allowed. The court declared that the property gifted to the plaintiff by his father (Rg;gpukzpa ehlhh;) on 07.03.1964 belongs to the plaintiff, and ordered recovery of possession. The court rejected the defendant's (gpujpthjp) counter-claims, finding no valid rights in the defendant over the property. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2021
Disposed
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2021
Judgement
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Mar-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Mar-2021
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Mar-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Jan-2021
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2020
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Dec-2020
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
15-Dec-2020
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2020
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Nov-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Oct-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Sep-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Aug-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Jul-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
05-May-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Mar-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2020
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
01-Oct-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Jun-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Jan-2019
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Dec-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Oct-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Sep-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2018
List / Special List
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Jun-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 400466/2015
Summary Case: O.S. 466/15 (Original Suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession) Court: Kancheepuram District Court, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 09.04.2021 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the property is allowed. The court declared that the property gifted to the plaintiff by his father (Rg;gpukzpa ehlhh;) on 07.03.1964 belongs to the plaintiff, and ordered recovery of possession. The court rejected the defendant's (gpujpthjp) counter-claims, finding no valid rights in the defendant over the property. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts