Vellaiya Nadar (Died) (through his Power agent Murugan) vs Poosaidurai Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN — 400466/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25a. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060001422015
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
400466/2015
Filing Date
16-10-2015
Registration No
400466/2015
Registration Date
16-10-2015
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vellaiya Nadar (Died) (through his Power agent Murugan)
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
Gomathikani
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
Eswari
Adv. Tr.M.R.K. Pandiyaraj
Karuppasamy
Respondent(s)
Poosaidurai Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN
Pathirakali
Sivaraman
Dhanalakshmi
Logeshwari
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Additional District Munsif
Trial
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Issue of Process
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Trial |
| 09-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 05-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 25-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 12-02-2026 | Issue of Process |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: O.S. 466/15 (Original Suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession) Court: Kancheepuram District Court, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 09.04.2021 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the property is allowed. The court declared that the property gifted to the plaintiff by his father (Rg;gpukzpa ehlhh;) on 07.03.1964 belongs to the plaintiff, and ordered recovery of possession. The court rejected the defendant's (gpujpthjp) counter-claims, finding no valid rights in the defendant over the property. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: O.S. 466/15 (Original Suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession) Court: Kancheepuram District Court, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 09.04.2021 Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the property is allowed. The court declared that the property gifted to the plaintiff by his father (Rg;gpukzpa ehlhh;) on 07.03.1964 belongs to the plaintiff, and ordered recovery of possession. The court rejected the defendant's (gpujpthjp) counter-claims, finding no valid rights in the defendant over the property. No costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts