Murugan vs K.Chellappa and 11 Others Advocate - Tr. T. Sathiya Nathan — 114/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS060000942025

Filing Number

95/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2022

Registration No

114/2022

Registration Date

26-Mar-2022

Court

Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

7-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. Tr.S.P.R. Pandiarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.Chellappa and 11 Others Advocate - Tr. T. Sathiya Nathan

  2. 2.K.Palanisamy

    Adv. P.Pitchi Raj

  3. 3.C.Valarmathi

  4. 4.Padmini

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  5. 5.Maheshraj

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  6. 6.Pandaram

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  7. 7.Velladurai

  8. 8.Madathi

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  9. 9.Ramesh

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  10. 10.Ramya

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  11. 11.Ramalakshmi

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

  12. 12.Marikkani

    Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai

Case History

  1. 12-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a cross-examination transcript (O.S. No. 114/2022) dated 05.03.2026 involving Defendant Maheswaj regarding property disputes and gift deeds. The defendant testified about receiving property through a gift deed approximately 4 years prior and acknowledged that defendants 4, 6-12 also received gifts. The court found the property's structure unclear and noted the defendant does not have his name on the current title deed, with steps being taken to register it. No specific court order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it appears to be testimony transcription only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  17. 19-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 18-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Additional District Munsif

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  23. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 19-Aug-2025

    Additional Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 12-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 06-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 26-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination transcript (O.S. No. 114/2022) dated 05.03.2026 involving Defendant Maheswaj regarding property disputes and gift deeds. The defendant testified about receiving property through a gift deed approximately 4 years prior and acknowledged that defendants 4, 6-12 also received gifts. The court found the property's structure unclear and noted the defendant does not have his name on the current title deed, with steps being taken to register it. No specific court order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it appears to be testimony transcription only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case