Murugan vs K.Chellappa and 11 Others Advocate - Tr. T. Sathiya Nathan — 114/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060000942025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
95/2025
Filing Date
26-03-2022
Registration No
114/2022
Registration Date
26-03-2022
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugan
Adv. Tr.S.P.R. Pandiarajan
Respondent(s)
K.Chellappa and 11 Others Advocate - Tr. T. Sathiya Nathan
K.Palanisamy
Adv. P.Pitchi Raj
C.Valarmathi
Padmini
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Maheshraj
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Pandaram
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Velladurai
Madathi
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Ramesh
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Ramya
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Ramalakshmi
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Marikkani
Adv. Tr.K.Thangadurai
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Additional District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a cross-examination transcript (O.S. No. 114/2022) dated 05.03.2026 involving Defendant Maheswaj regarding property disputes and gift deeds. The defendant testified about receiving property through a gift deed approximately 4 years prior and acknowledged that defendants 4, 6-12 also received gifts. The court found the property's structure unclear and noted the defendant does not have his name on the current title deed, with steps being taken to register it. No specific court order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it appears to be testimony transcription only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a cross-examination transcript (O.S. No. 114/2022) dated 05.03.2026 involving Defendant Maheswaj regarding property disputes and gift deeds. The defendant testified about receiving property through a gift deed approximately 4 years prior and acknowledged that defendants 4, 6-12 also received gifts. The court found the property's structure unclear and noted the defendant does not have his name on the current title deed, with steps being taken to register it. No specific court order granting or dismissing the petition is stated in this document—it appears to be testimony transcription only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts