S. Rajalingapandian @ Rajakulapandian vs Kanagarathinam and 4 Ors. Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN — 138/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060000862025
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
22-04-2019
Registration No
138/2019
Registration Date
22-04-2019
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Rajalingapandian @ Rajakulapandian
Adv. Tr.S.P.R. Pandiarajan
Respondent(s)
Kanagarathinam and 4 Ors. Advocate - R.JEGADEESAN
Tamil Kodi
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Poonkani
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Ramesh Nadar
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Davasi Muthu @ Durai Raj
Poovammal
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Mallika
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Rani
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Renuka
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Shanmugasundar
Adv. R.JEGADEESAN
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Additional District Munsif
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. No. 138/2019 dated 13.02.2026, the court (Additional District Judge, Tenkasi) affirmed its judgment regarding a property dispute involving land parcels 689/1 and related properties. The court upheld its previous findings regarding ownership rights, rejecting the defendant's (DW1) contentions about ancestral property claims and a settlement deed dated 09.03.2006, and confirmed that the plaintiff's rights to the disputed properties remain valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. No. 138/2019 dated 13.02.2026, the court (Additional District Judge, Tenkasi) affirmed its judgment regarding a property dispute involving land parcels 689/1 and related properties. The court upheld its previous findings regarding ownership rights, rejecting the defendant's (DW1) contentions about ancestral property claims and a settlement deed dated 09.03.2006, and confirmed that the plaintiff's rights to the disputed properties remain valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts