Mahalingam vs Murugan Advocate - Tr.S.Murugesan — 88/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS060000572024
Filing Number
217/2023
Filing Date
18-Apr-2023
Registration No
88/2023
Registration Date
18-Apr-2023
Court
Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
7-Additional District Munsif
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahalingam
Adv. T.PANDIYARAJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Murugan Advocate - Tr.S.Murugesan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This case involves a property dispute concerning land division among family members. The defendant (DW1) Murugan testified during cross-examination regarding property boundaries, land allocations from ancestral division, and documentary evidence related to the disputed land. The court found credibility issues with the defendant's testimony regarding property records, boundaries, and the chain of ownership, while noting inconsistencies in the documentation produced. The judgment emphasizes the defendant's inability to substantiate ownership claims with proper documentation and contradictions in his account of the property's history and allocation among family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2025
Issue of Process
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Issue of Process
Additional District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Oct-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jun-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2025
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2024
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
02-Sep-2024
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jun-2024
Appearance
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2024
Issues
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2023
This case involves a property dispute concerning land division among family members. The defendant (DW1) Murugan testified during cross-examination regarding property boundaries, land allocations from ancestral division, and documentary evidence related to the disputed land. The court found credibility issues with the defendant's testimony regarding property records, boundaries, and the chain of ownership, while noting inconsistencies in the documentation produced. The judgment emphasizes the defendant's inability to substantiate ownership claims with proper documentation and contradictions in his account of the property's history and allocation among family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts