Shanmugathai and 3others vs The District collector and another Advocate - Government Pleader — 531/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS050006462024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
751/2024
Filing Date
07-11-2024
Registration No
531/2024
Registration Date
22-11-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shanmugathai and 3others
Adv. Tr.V.Subramanian
Respondent(s)
The District collector and another Advocate - Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 18-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (OS. 531/2024 - Tenkaasi District Court, 30.03.2026) The plaintiff's cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein he affirmed that he is the heir of Duraiswamy. The court found critical gaps in the plaintiff's evidence: he failed to produce documents proving the first wife's marriage to Duraiswamy, failed to provide evidence that defendants 2 and 3 were born to the first wife, and failed to establish proper grounds to challenge the second marriage. The petition is dismissed for lack of substantive evidence to support the plaintiff's claims of heirship and succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (OS. 531/2024 - Tenkaasi District Court, 30.03.2026) The plaintiff's cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein he affirmed that he is the heir of Duraiswamy. The court found critical gaps in the plaintiff's evidence: he failed to produce documents proving the first wife's marriage to Duraiswamy, failed to provide evidence that defendants 2 and 3 were born to the first wife, and failed to establish proper grounds to challenge the second marriage. The petition is dismissed for lack of substantive evidence to support the plaintiff's claims of heirship and succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts