Shanmugathai and 3others vs The District collector and another Advocate - Government Pleader — 531/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050006462024

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

751/2024

Filing Date

07-11-2024

Registration No

531/2024

Registration Date

22-11-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or.7,R.1
IA/2/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Shanmugathai and 3othersThe District collector and another

Petitioner(s)

Shanmugathai and 3others

Adv. Tr.V.Subramanian

Respondent(s)

The District collector and another Advocate - Government Pleader

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

29-04-2026

Evidence

30-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Trial

18-02-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

30-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary (OS. 531/2024 - Tenkaasi District Court, 30.03.2026) The plaintiff's cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein he affirmed that he is the heir of Duraiswamy. The court found critical gaps in the plaintiff's evidence: he failed to produce documents proving the first wife's marriage to Duraiswamy, failed to provide evidence that defendants 2 and 3 were born to the first wife, and failed to establish proper grounds to challenge the second marriage. The petition is dismissed for lack of substantive evidence to support the plaintiff's claims of heirship and succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (OS. 531/2024 - Tenkaasi District Court, 30.03.2026) The plaintiff's cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein he affirmed that he is the heir of Duraiswamy. The court found critical gaps in the plaintiff's evidence: he failed to produce documents proving the first wife's marriage to Duraiswamy, failed to provide evidence that defendants 2 and 3 were born to the first wife, and failed to establish proper grounds to challenge the second marriage. The petition is dismissed for lack of substantive evidence to support the plaintiff's claims of heirship and succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case