Pathirakali and 6 others vs Sankarlal Advocate - Tr.R.Ganapathy — 467/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS050005852024
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
685/2024
Filing Date
27-09-2024
Registration No
467/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pathirakali and 6 others
Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan
Petchimuth
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Valliammal
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Magesh
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Lebin
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Minor Ragu
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Minor.Kartheesh
Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)
Respondent(s)
Sankarlal Advocate - Tr.R.Ganapathy
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: OS.467/2024 Date: 24.02.2026 Court: Principal District Judge (Property), Tenkasi This is a cross-examination in a property dispute (Original Suit) involving land survey numbers 283 and 283/5. The defendant (Sankarallal) contested the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership, boundaries, and documentation of the disputed properties, highlighting discrepancies in names, survey records, and deed ownership. No final order on merits was pronounced; only cross-examination statements were recorded, with no counter-examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: OS.467/2024 Date: 24.02.2026 Court: Principal District Judge (Property), Tenkasi This is a cross-examination in a property dispute (Original Suit) involving land survey numbers 283 and 283/5. The defendant (Sankarallal) contested the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership, boundaries, and documentation of the disputed properties, highlighting discrepancies in names, survey records, and deed ownership. No final order on merits was pronounced; only cross-examination statements were recorded, with no counter-examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts