Pathirakali and 6 others vs Sankarlal Advocate - Tr.R.Ganapathy — 467/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050005852024

Arguments

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

685/2024

Filing Date

27-09-2024

Registration No

467/2024

Registration Date

27-09-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

Pathirakali and 6 others

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Petchimuth

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Valliammal

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Magesh

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Lebin

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Minor Ragu

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Minor.Kartheesh

Tr.S.Pandiarajan (MA)

Respondent(s)

Sankarlal Advocate - Tr.R.Ganapathy

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

05-03-2026

Arguments

24-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: OS.467/2024 Date: 24.02.2026 Court: Principal District Judge (Property), Tenkasi This is a cross-examination in a property dispute (Original Suit) involving land survey numbers 283 and 283/5. The defendant (Sankarallal) contested the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership, boundaries, and documentation of the disputed properties, highlighting discrepancies in names, survey records, and deed ownership. No final order on merits was pronounced; only cross-examination statements were recorded, with no counter-examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: OS.467/2024 Date: 24.02.2026 Court: Principal District Judge (Property), Tenkasi This is a cross-examination in a property dispute (Original Suit) involving land survey numbers 283 and 283/5. The defendant (Sankarallal) contested the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership, boundaries, and documentation of the disputed properties, highlighting discrepancies in names, survey records, and deed ownership. No final order on merits was pronounced; only cross-examination statements were recorded, with no counter-examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case