M. Raj vs Bioniar Wind Com (P)Ltd.,Saithapet,Chennai thr.its Vice President of Rajendran and 4 Ors. — 300048/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or21R32(5). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTS050004332018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
433/2018
Filing Date
28-09-2018
Registration No
300048/2018
Registration Date
09-11-2018
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Raj
Adv. Tr.U. Palani Kumar
Respondent(s)
Bioniar Wind Com (P)Ltd.,Saithapet,Chennai thr.its Vice President of Rajendran and 4 Ors.
Surana Corporation Ltd.,Chennai thr.its Director of Sandeep Karana
Executive Officer, TNEB, Wind Electricity Farm Project, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-11
Adv. Government Pleader
President, TNEB, Anna Salai, Chennai
Adv. Government Pleader
JE, TNEB, Puliangudi
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Stay | |
| 10-03-2026 | Stay | |
| 07-02-2026 | Stay | |
| 06-01-2026 | Stay | |
| 28-11-2025 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of witness Vinothkumar (age 39) recorded on 10.06.2025 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi in case EA.4/2022. The witness testified about events on 18.11.2022 when electricity authorities and court officials visited the first respondent's property to disconnect a wind turbine, and the witness recorded videos and photographs on his mobile phone. During cross-examination, witnesses and the court questioned the authenticity and reliability of the evidence, with suggestions that the witness may have provided biased testimony in favor of the first respondent due to family relations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of witness Vinothkumar (age 39) recorded on 10.06.2025 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi in case EA.4/2022. The witness testified about events on 18.11.2022 when electricity authorities and court officials visited the first respondent's property to disconnect a wind turbine, and the witness recorded videos and photographs on his mobile phone. During cross-examination, witnesses and the court questioned the authenticity and reliability of the evidence, with suggestions that the witness may have provided biased testimony in favor of the first respondent due to family relations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts