Ravikumar and another vs Subramanian and 4 others — 308/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050004272023

Appearance

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

605/2023

Filing Date

20-12-2023

Registration No

308/2023

Registration Date

20-12-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Condonation of Delay Petition Section Subramanian and 4 othersRavikumar and another
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section Ravikumar and another

Petitioner(s)

Ravikumar and another

Adv. Tr.K.Rajmahendran

Mariammal

Tr.K.Rajmahendran (MA)

Respondent(s)

Subramanian and 4 others

Valli

Ponnukutti

Prema

Sudalaimuthu

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

05-03-2026

Appearance

23-02-2026

Appearance

09-02-2026

Appearance

09-01-2026

Await Reports

12-12-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

06-12-2024
Copy of Judgment

SUMMARY In this Tamil Nadu property dispute (Case No. 308/2023), the Primary District Civil Court of Tenkaasi granted the plaintiffs' claim for possession of three plot portions (Plot 1, 2, and 3) that were illegally encroached upon by the defendants (Defendants 1-2, Defendant 3, and Defendant 5 respectively). The court ordered the defendants to demolish all unauthorized structures constructed on the plaintiffs' properties and restore possession to the plaintiffs within a specified timeframe, with costs to be borne by the defendants. Since the defendants failed to submit counter-arguments despite proper notice, they were deemed ex-parte and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In this Tamil Nadu property dispute (Case No. 308/2023), the Primary District Civil Court of Tenkaasi granted the plaintiffs' claim for possession of three plot portions (Plot 1, 2, and 3) that were illegally encroached upon by the defendants (Defendants 1-2, Defendant 3, and Defendant 5 respectively). The court ordered the defendants to demolish all unauthorized structures constructed on the plaintiffs' properties and restore possession to the plaintiffs within a specified timeframe, with costs to be borne by the defendants. Since the defendants failed to submit counter-arguments despite proper notice, they were deemed ex-parte and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case