Ravikumar and another vs Subramanian and 4 others — 308/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS050004272023
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
605/2023
Filing Date
20-12-2023
Registration No
308/2023
Registration Date
20-12-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravikumar and another
Adv. Tr.K.Rajmahendran
Mariammal
Tr.K.Rajmahendran (MA)
Respondent(s)
Subramanian and 4 others
Valli
Ponnukutti
Prema
Sudalaimuthu
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Await Reports
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 23-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 09-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 09-01-2026 | Await Reports |
| 12-12-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY In this Tamil Nadu property dispute (Case No. 308/2023), the Primary District Civil Court of Tenkaasi granted the plaintiffs' claim for possession of three plot portions (Plot 1, 2, and 3) that were illegally encroached upon by the defendants (Defendants 1-2, Defendant 3, and Defendant 5 respectively). The court ordered the defendants to demolish all unauthorized structures constructed on the plaintiffs' properties and restore possession to the plaintiffs within a specified timeframe, with costs to be borne by the defendants. Since the defendants failed to submit counter-arguments despite proper notice, they were deemed ex-parte and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY In this Tamil Nadu property dispute (Case No. 308/2023), the Primary District Civil Court of Tenkaasi granted the plaintiffs' claim for possession of three plot portions (Plot 1, 2, and 3) that were illegally encroached upon by the defendants (Defendants 1-2, Defendant 3, and Defendant 5 respectively). The court ordered the defendants to demolish all unauthorized structures constructed on the plaintiffs' properties and restore possession to the plaintiffs within a specified timeframe, with costs to be borne by the defendants. Since the defendants failed to submit counter-arguments despite proper notice, they were deemed ex-parte and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts