Aasaithambi vs Thangapandi Advocate - Tmt.M. Thahira begam — 37/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 32. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTS050003572024
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2024
Filing Number
413/2024
Filing Date
29-04-2024
Registration No
37/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aasaithambi
Adv. JaganSrinath K.S
Respondent(s)
Thangapandi Advocate - Tmt.M. Thahira begam
Balamanikandan
Adv. Tmt.M. Thahira begam
Murugan
Adv. Tmt.M. Thahira begam
Muthukrishnan
Adv. Tmt.M. Thahira begam
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
EA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-02-2026 | EA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (dated 03.02.2026) of witness PW2 Balamanigandan in Execution Appeal EA.05/2026 arising from Original Suit O.S.No. 33/2007. The document records the witness's sworn affirmation and responses to 16 questions posed by the opposing counsel regarding a property dispute involving a pathway, building construction, survey numbers, and an earlier court judgment. No substantive order disposing the case is provided—the document concludes with "No re-examination" and the judge's signature, indicating this is merely the examination transcript without a final ruling on the execution appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination record (dated 03.02.2026) of witness PW2 Balamanigandan in Execution Appeal EA.05/2026 arising from Original Suit O.S.No. 33/2007. The document records the witness's sworn affirmation and responses to 16 questions posed by the opposing counsel regarding a property dispute involving a pathway, building construction, survey numbers, and an earlier court judgment. No substantive order disposing the case is provided—the document concludes with "No re-examination" and the judge's signature, indicating this is merely the examination transcript without a final ruling on the execution appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts