Jeyalaksmi vs Arumugam and 3 others — 244/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050003372023

Trial

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

469/2023

Filing Date

21-09-2023

Registration No

244/2023

Registration Date

21-09-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

Jeyalaksmi

Adv. Tmt.S.Manju Krishna

Respondent(s)

Arumugam and 3 others

Kannan

Adv. Tr.X.Jude Roy Jeyaseelan

Thirmalaikumar

Adv. Tmt.M. Thahira begam

Vallimurugan

Adv. Tr.C.Kathiresan

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

05-03-2026

Trial

05-03-2026

Trial

20-02-2026

Trial

11-02-2026

Trial

14-11-2025

Trial

Interim Orders

13-02-2025
Copy of Deposition

This is an examination of the 3rd defendant (Thirumalaikumar) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, dated 13.02.2025, by the Principal District Civil Judge, Tenkasi. The defendant provided statements regarding disputed land ownership of 8 cents within Survey No. 631/12 (total 52 cents), clarifying his received portion and denying interference with the plaintiff's 8-cent allocation, while stating he has no authority over the remaining 28 cents' ownership and that the 1st defendant (Arumugan) failed to settle his entitled portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is an examination of the 3rd defendant (Thirumalaikumar) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, dated 13.02.2025, by the Principal District Civil Judge, Tenkasi. The defendant provided statements regarding disputed land ownership of 8 cents within Survey No. 631/12 (total 52 cents), clarifying his received portion and denying interference with the plaintiff's 8-cent allocation, while stating he has no authority over the remaining 28 cents' ownership and that the 1st defendant (Arumugan) failed to settle his entitled portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case