Sudalaimuthu nadar and 8 others vs Vasikaran and another Advocate - Tr.R.Madakkan — 128/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050001902023

Filing Number

263/2023

Filing Date

01-Jun-2023

Registration No

128/2023

Registration Date

01-Jun-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudalaimuthu nadar and 8 others

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  2. 2.Kuthalinga Nadar

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  3. 3.Subramanian

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  4. 4.Paramasivan

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  5. 5.Kuthalingam

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  6. 6.Ganesan

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  7. 7.Karthick kumar

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  8. 8.Kannan

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

  9. 9.Manikandan

    Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasikaran and another Advocate - Tr.R.Madakkan

  2. 2.Azhagumuthu

    Adv. R. MADAKKAN

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a cross-examination of the plaintiff (PW1-Paramsivam) in O.S. No. 128/2023 dated 24.02.2026 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 384A/2 and 384A/3. The plaintiff's testimony confirms ownership of 2/3 share in survey 384A/2 (53 cents total) and 10.5/14 cents in survey 384A/3; however, the court found that the plaintiff has no valid claim to the remaining land as it is held by other parties with valid deeds. No cross-examination from defendants is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  11. 02-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  12. 03-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  13. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  14. 07-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 07-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  17. 14-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif

  18. 04-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Munsif

  19. 13-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif

  20. 19-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif

  21. 17-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif

  22. 21-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Munsif

  23. 14-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  24. 18-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  25. 06-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  26. 20-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  27. 04-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  28. 01-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 01-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a cross-examination of the plaintiff (PW1-Paramsivam) in O.S. No. 128/2023 dated 24.02.2026 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 384A/2 and 384A/3. The plaintiff's testimony confirms ownership of 2/3 share in survey 384A/2 (53 cents total) and 10.5/14 cents in survey 384A/3; however, the court found that the plaintiff has no valid claim to the remaining land as it is held by other parties with valid deeds. No cross-examination from defendants is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case