Sudalaimuthu nadar and 8 others vs Vasikaran and another Advocate - Tr.R.Madakkan — 128/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050001902023

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

263/2023

Filing Date

01-06-2023

Registration No

128/2023

Registration Date

01-06-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

Sudalaimuthu nadar and 8 others

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Kuthalinga Nadar

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Subramanian

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Paramasivan

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Kuthalingam

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Ganesan

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Karthick kumar

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Kannan

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Manikandan

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Respondent(s)

Vasikaran and another Advocate - Tr.R.Madakkan

Azhagumuthu

Adv. R. MADAKKAN

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

18-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a cross-examination of the plaintiff (PW1-Paramsivam) in O.S. No. 128/2023 dated 24.02.2026 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 384A/2 and 384A/3. The plaintiff's testimony confirms ownership of 2/3 share in survey 384A/2 (53 cents total) and 10.5/14 cents in survey 384A/3; however, the court found that the plaintiff has no valid claim to the remaining land as it is held by other parties with valid deeds. No cross-examination from defendants is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a cross-examination of the plaintiff (PW1-Paramsivam) in O.S. No. 128/2023 dated 24.02.2026 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 384A/2 and 384A/3. The plaintiff's testimony confirms ownership of 2/3 share in survey 384A/2 (53 cents total) and 10.5/14 cents in survey 384A/3; however, the court found that the plaintiff has no valid claim to the remaining land as it is held by other parties with valid deeds. No cross-examination from defendants is recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case