Murugan vs Kumarasamy Advocate - Tmt.B.Muthulakshmi — 142/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7, R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS050001802022
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
260/2022
Filing Date
20-04-2022
Registration No
142/2022
Registration Date
20-04-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugan
Adv. Tr.P.Radha Krishnan
Respondent(s)
Kumarasamy Advocate - Tmt.B.Muthulakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S.No.142/2022 Court: Principal District Court, Nellai (Tirunelveli), Tamil Nadu Date: 04.02.2026 Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of Defendant-Witness 1 (DW1 - Kumarasamy) regarding a property dispute involving path/access rights and property partition among six co-heirs. The court examined testimony on property division under 1993 partition deed, access routes to properties, and disputed right-of-way through a common well. No final judgment appears to have been rendered in this order—it records only the cross-examination proceedings and witness testimony on recorded facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S.No.142/2022 Court: Principal District Court, Nellai (Tirunelveli), Tamil Nadu Date: 04.02.2026 Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of Defendant-Witness 1 (DW1 - Kumarasamy) regarding a property dispute involving path/access rights and property partition among six co-heirs. The court examined testimony on property division under 1993 partition deed, access routes to properties, and disputed right-of-way through a common well. No final judgment appears to have been rendered in this order—it records only the cross-examination proceedings and witness testimony on recorded facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts