Mariselvi vs Paramasankar Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi — 37/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS050000412024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
63/2024
Filing Date
03-02-2024
Registration No
37/2024
Registration Date
03-02-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariselvi
Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan
Respondent(s)
Paramasankar Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 19-12-2025 | Appearance | |
| 28-11-2025 | Appearance | |
| 30-10-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
The plaintiff's statement of claim in this inheritance dispute (Case No. 37/2024, Tenkaasi District Court, dated 19.02.2025) indicates that properties inherited under a will are in dispute with the defendant. The plaintiff conditionally withdraws claims regarding Property 1 if the defendant has not encroached upon it, and regarding Properties 3-4 if the defendant acknowledges the plaintiff's right to a shared passageway; however, the plaintiff reserves the right to pursue the case if the will provisions regarding the passageway are not honored, with potential for settlement if properties are properly demarcated according to the will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The plaintiff's statement of claim in this inheritance dispute (Case No. 37/2024, Tenkaasi District Court, dated 19.02.2025) indicates that properties inherited under a will are in dispute with the defendant. The plaintiff conditionally withdraws claims regarding Property 1 if the defendant has not encroached upon it, and regarding Properties 3-4 if the defendant acknowledges the plaintiff's right to a shared passageway; however, the plaintiff reserves the right to pursue the case if the will provisions regarding the passageway are not honored, with potential for settlement if properties are properly demarcated according to the will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts