Mariselvi vs Paramasankar Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi — 37/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS050000412024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

63/2024

Filing Date

03-02-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

03-02-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or.7,R.1
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition to appoint commissioner Section MariselviParamasankar
IA/4/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section MariselviParamasankar

Petitioner(s)

Mariselvi

Adv. Tr.S.Pandiarajan

Respondent(s)

Paramasankar Advocate - Tr.S.P.Esakkipandi

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Appearance

19-12-2025

Appearance

28-11-2025

Appearance

30-10-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

19-02-2025
Copy of Deposition

The plaintiff's statement of claim in this inheritance dispute (Case No. 37/2024, Tenkaasi District Court, dated 19.02.2025) indicates that properties inherited under a will are in dispute with the defendant. The plaintiff conditionally withdraws claims regarding Property 1 if the defendant has not encroached upon it, and regarding Properties 3-4 if the defendant acknowledges the plaintiff's right to a shared passageway; however, the plaintiff reserves the right to pursue the case if the will provisions regarding the passageway are not honored, with potential for settlement if properties are properly demarcated according to the will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The plaintiff's statement of claim in this inheritance dispute (Case No. 37/2024, Tenkaasi District Court, dated 19.02.2025) indicates that properties inherited under a will are in dispute with the defendant. The plaintiff conditionally withdraws claims regarding Property 1 if the defendant has not encroached upon it, and regarding Properties 3-4 if the defendant acknowledges the plaintiff's right to a shared passageway; however, the plaintiff reserves the right to pursue the case if the will provisions regarding the passageway are not honored, with potential for settlement if properties are properly demarcated according to the will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case