Vadivu and 3 others vs Prabhu and 2 others — 225/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040020492024
Filing Number
909/2023
Filing Date
17-Jul-2023
Registration No
225/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vadivu and 3 others
Adv. Tr.K.Eskkidurai
-
2.Thirumalaikumar
-
3.Lakshmi Sankar
-
4.Padma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prabhu and 2 others
-
2.Kamala
-
3.The New India Assurance Company Ltd
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
03-Jun-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
In Motor Cycle Accident Case 225/2023, the court heard witness testimony from Lakshmi Sankar regarding a fatal accident involving the petitioner's father (aged 76). The court rejected several assertions made by the petitioner, including claims that respondents 2-4 were dependent on the deceased, that accident documents were missing, and that the first respondent's driver bore no fault. The court held the insurance company (third respondent) liable to pay compensation and dismissed the petition against the third respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
08-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 225/2023
In Motor Cycle Accident Case 225/2023, the court heard witness testimony from Lakshmi Sankar regarding a fatal accident involving the petitioner's father (aged 76). The court rejected several assertions made by the petitioner, including claims that respondents 2-4 were dependent on the deceased, that accident documents were missing, and that the first respondent's driver bore no fault. The court held the insurance company (third respondent) liable to pay compensation and dismissed the petition against the third respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts