Kaliammal and 3 others vs The Branch Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company ltd, Chennai — 9/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040019092024
Filing Number
839/2023
Filing Date
04-Jan-2023
Registration No
9/2023
Registration Date
12-Jan-2023
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kaliammal and 3 others
Adv. Tr.A.Murugan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Branch Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company ltd, Chennai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: Kaliammal v. HDFC ERGO (M.A.C.O.P. 9/2023) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tenkasi dismissed the petitioners' compensation claim seeking Rs. 80 lakhs for the death of Murugan, who lost control of his two-wheeler due to sudden cattle crossing and died in the accident. The tribunal held that the deceased, as the vehicle owner, was not a "third party" under Motor Vehicles Act sections 140 and 163A, and therefore the insurance company had no liability to compensate his legal heirs. Additionally, the tribunal found the vehicle was insured under a personal accident cover (contractual matter), outside the tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Jun-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2023
Summary: Kaliammal v. HDFC ERGO (M.A.C.O.P. 9/2023) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tenkasi dismissed the petitioners' compensation claim seeking Rs. 80 lakhs for the death of Murugan, who lost control of his two-wheeler due to sudden cattle crossing and died in the accident. The tribunal held that the deceased, as the vehicle owner, was not a "third party" under Motor Vehicles Act sections 140 and 163A, and therefore the insurance company had no liability to compensate his legal heirs. Additionally, the tribunal found the vehicle was insured under a personal accident cover (contractual matter), outside the tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts