Kaliammal and 3 others vs The Branch Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company ltd, Chennai — 9/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS040019092024

Filing Number

839/2023

Filing Date

04-Jan-2023

Registration No

9/2023

Registration Date

12-Jan-2023

Court

Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi

Judge

5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kaliammal and 3 others

    Adv. Tr.A.Murugan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Branch Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance company ltd, Chennai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: Kaliammal v. HDFC ERGO (M.A.C.O.P. 9/2023) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tenkasi dismissed the petitioners' compensation claim seeking Rs. 80 lakhs for the death of Murugan, who lost control of his two-wheeler due to sudden cattle crossing and died in the accident. The tribunal held that the deceased, as the vehicle owner, was not a "third party" under Motor Vehicles Act sections 140 and 163A, and therefore the insurance company had no liability to compensate his legal heirs. Additionally, the tribunal found the vehicle was insured under a personal accident cover (contractual matter), outside the tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  11. 14-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  12. 03-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  13. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  14. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  15. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 04-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Kaliammal v. HDFC ERGO (M.A.C.O.P. 9/2023) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tenkasi dismissed the petitioners' compensation claim seeking Rs. 80 lakhs for the death of Murugan, who lost control of his two-wheeler due to sudden cattle crossing and died in the accident. The tribunal held that the deceased, as the vehicle owner, was not a "third party" under Motor Vehicles Act sections 140 and 163A, and therefore the insurance company had no liability to compensate his legal heirs. Additionally, the tribunal found the vehicle was insured under a personal accident cover (contractual matter), outside the tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case