Krishnan vs Krishnaveni @ Krishnammal — 289/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040004992023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
289/2023
Filing Date
21-11-2023
Registration No
289/2023
Registration Date
02-12-2023
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnan
Adv. Thiru. Muruganantham
Respondent(s)
Krishnaveni @ Krishnammal
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from HMP (likely a family court) case no. 289/2023 dated 20.06.2025 from Thenkasi. The document contains testimony/cross-examination of a witness (Krishnan) regarding a matrimonial matter, including details about marriage date (5.11.2003), children born in 2004 and 2006, and various family disputes. The final order by Additional Judge A. Bismitha dismisses the petition, holding that the petitioner's claims lack merit and the petition is not maintainable under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from HMP (likely a family court) case no. 289/2023 dated 20.06.2025 from Thenkasi. The document contains testimony/cross-examination of a witness (Krishnan) regarding a matrimonial matter, including details about marriage date (5.11.2003), children born in 2004 and 2006, and various family disputes. The final order by Additional Judge A. Bismitha dismisses the petition, holding that the petitioner's claims lack merit and the petition is not maintainable under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts