Muppidathi vs Subramanian and two others — 200059/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040004012021
Filing Number
200059/2021
Filing Date
05-Jul-2021
Registration No
200059/2021
Registration Date
05-Jul-2021
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muppidathi
Adv. Tr.T.Murugaiaha pandian
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subramanian and two others
-
2.M. Shenbagam
-
3.Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company, Tenkasi
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary In case Mcop 59/2021 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, witness Saraswathi (a junior assistant at the Tenkasi Regional Transport Office) testified regarding whether one Subramanian possessed a valid driver's license. The witness stated that no driver's license for Subramanian was issued from their office, and it cannot be determined from name and address alone whether a license exists elsewhere. The court recorded the witness deposition and the opposing party accepted the cross-examination testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
08-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
16-Aug-2023
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Jul-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
25-Apr-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Mar-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
11-Feb-2023
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2023
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Sep-2022
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
13-Aug-2022
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
26-Jun-2022
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 200059/2021
Summary In case Mcop 59/2021 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, witness Saraswathi (a junior assistant at the Tenkasi Regional Transport Office) testified regarding whether one Subramanian possessed a valid driver's license. The witness stated that no driver's license for Subramanian was issued from their office, and it cannot be determined from name and address alone whether a license exists elsewhere. The court recorded the witness deposition and the opposing party accepted the cross-examination testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts