Muppidathi vs Subramanian and two others — 200059/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040004012021
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
200059/2021
Filing Date
05-07-2021
Registration No
200059/2021
Registration Date
05-07-2021
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muppidathi
Adv. Tr.T.Murugaiaha pandian
Respondent(s)
Subramanian and two others
M. Shenbagam
Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company, Tenkasi
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In case Mcop 59/2021 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, witness Saraswathi (a junior assistant at the Tenkasi Regional Transport Office) testified regarding whether one Subramanian possessed a valid driver's license. The witness stated that no driver's license for Subramanian was issued from their office, and it cannot be determined from name and address alone whether a license exists elsewhere. The court recorded the witness deposition and the opposing party accepted the cross-examination testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In case Mcop 59/2021 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, witness Saraswathi (a junior assistant at the Tenkasi Regional Transport Office) testified regarding whether one Subramanian possessed a valid driver's license. The witness stated that no driver's license for Subramanian was issued from their office, and it cannot be determined from name and address alone whether a license exists elsewhere. The court recorded the witness deposition and the opposing party accepted the cross-examination testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts