P. Pandiarajan vs M. Selvalakshmi Advocate - Thiru. Arumugam @ Kannan — 255/2022
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
HMOP - Hindu Marriage Original Peitition
CNR: TNTS040003722022
Filing Number
255/2022
Filing Date
09-Nov-2022
Registration No
255/2022
Registration Date
09-Nov-2022
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P. Pandiarajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. Selvalakshmi Advocate - Thiru. Arumugam @ Kannan
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Mediation
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Mediation
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Restored
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary Case: S.P.O. (Specific Performance Petition) 255/2022, High Court, Chennai Outcome: The petition was dismissed for default on October 4, 2024. The petitioner failed to appear despite sufficient notice and no representation was provided. Since the petition had been pending for over 2 years without progress, the court dismissed it with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Oct-2024
Disposed
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 255/2022
Case Summary Case: S.P.O. (Specific Performance Petition) 255/2022, High Court, Chennai Outcome: The petition was dismissed for default on October 4, 2024. The petitioner failed to appear despite sufficient notice and no representation was provided. Since the petition had been pending for over 2 years without progress, the court dismissed it with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts