Baskar vs Subash and 3 anothers — 200372/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS040002892021

Evidence

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

200372/2021

Filing Date

15-07-2021

Registration No

200372/2021

Registration Date

15-07-2021

Court

Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi

Judge

5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Baskar

Adv. Tr.E.Raja M.A.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Subash and 3 anothers

Karuppasamy

Siva Sathya Moorthy

United India Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

05-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

28-01-2026

Evidence

08-01-2026

Evidence

10-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

28-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a deposition of witness (Mudhukumaar) recorded on 28.01.2026 in a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case (MCOP 372/2021 c/w 135/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, employed as an assistant manager by the insurance company (respondent 3 & 4), testified regarding a two-vehicle collision and cross-examined on liability and insurance coverage claims. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the insurance company's position that 50% liability settlement is inappropriate under Motor Vehicles Act sections 3 and 4, and various other factual contentions related to the accident and insurance entitlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a deposition of witness (Mudhukumaar) recorded on 28.01.2026 in a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case (MCOP 372/2021 c/w 135/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, employed as an assistant manager by the insurance company (respondent 3 & 4), testified regarding a two-vehicle collision and cross-examined on liability and insurance coverage claims. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the insurance company's position that 50% liability settlement is inappropriate under Motor Vehicles Act sections 3 and 4, and various other factual contentions related to the accident and insurance entitlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case