Baskar vs Subash and 3 anothers — 200372/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTS040002892021
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
200372/2021
Filing Date
15-07-2021
Registration No
200372/2021
Registration Date
15-07-2021
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baskar
Adv. Tr.E.Raja M.A.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Subash and 3 anothers
Karuppasamy
Siva Sathya Moorthy
United India Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a deposition of witness (Mudhukumaar) recorded on 28.01.2026 in a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case (MCOP 372/2021 c/w 135/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, employed as an assistant manager by the insurance company (respondent 3 & 4), testified regarding a two-vehicle collision and cross-examined on liability and insurance coverage claims. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the insurance company's position that 50% liability settlement is inappropriate under Motor Vehicles Act sections 3 and 4, and various other factual contentions related to the accident and insurance entitlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a deposition of witness (Mudhukumaar) recorded on 28.01.2026 in a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case (MCOP 372/2021 c/w 135/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, employed as an assistant manager by the insurance company (respondent 3 & 4), testified regarding a two-vehicle collision and cross-examined on liability and insurance coverage claims. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the insurance company's position that 50% liability settlement is inappropriate under Motor Vehicles Act sections 3 and 4, and various other factual contentions related to the accident and insurance entitlements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts