Lingadurai vs Arul Pushparaj and 2 others — 417/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 26-Mar-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS040002682022

Filing Number

105/2022

Filing Date

02-Dec-2022

Registration No

417/2022

Registration Date

02-Dec-2022

Court

Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi

Judge

5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lingadurai

    Adv. Tr.K.Kumaresan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arul Pushparaj and 2 others

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a deposition of witness Muthukumar recorded on 12.02.2026 in Motor Claim Petition 417/2022 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, an administrative officer of the respondent organization, testified regarding an insurance claim related to vehicle TN.67.AP.7268 involved in an accident, and during cross-examination denied giving false information to deprive the petitioner of insurance benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  15. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  17. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  19. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  20. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  21. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  22. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  23. 04-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  25. 06-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  27. 08-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  28. 07-Jun-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  29. 02-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  30. 10-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  31. 07-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  32. 19-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  33. 08-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  34. 27-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  35. 19-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  36. 08-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  37. 20-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 02-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a deposition of witness Muthukumar recorded on 12.02.2026 in Motor Claim Petition 417/2022 before the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. The witness, an administrative officer of the respondent organization, testified regarding an insurance claim related to vehicle TN.67.AP.7268 involved in an accident, and during cross-examination denied giving false information to deprive the petitioner of insurance benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case