Ganana Puspham vs Vijayalakshmi and 15 others Advocate - abdul — 200167/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37 (2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS040000552018
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
200167/2018
Filing Date
20-04-2018
Registration No
200167/2018
Registration Date
20-08-2018
Court
Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi
Judge
5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganana Puspham
Adv. K.Kasi
Respondent(s)
Vijayalakshmi and 15 others Advocate - abdul
Devi
Pappa
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Kala
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Alli
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Meena
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Arumugam
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Poopathi
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Annathai
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Karunanithi
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Suresh @ Subbiah
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Pushpam
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Gnanam
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Packiyamuthu
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Achirvatham
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Chidamparam
Adv. Tr.N.Maridurai
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge
Evidence
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Hindu joint family property partition case (O.S. 167/2018), the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony regarding ancestral property inheritance and family succession. The court examined the plaintiff's claims about property shares inherited through her husband from ancestor Bhakiyamuthu, including documentation from 1926 and 1932, and cross-examined defendants 1 and 2 (the plaintiff's daughters) regarding their respective shares in 12 jointly-held properties. The judgment affirms the plaintiff's entitlement to specific shares and confirms that defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to divide their portions without the plaintiff's objection, while establishing that relatives who converted to Christianity forfeited their inheritance rights in the Hindu joint family property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Hindu joint family property partition case (O.S. 167/2018), the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony regarding ancestral property inheritance and family succession. The court examined the plaintiff's claims about property shares inherited through her husband from ancestor Bhakiyamuthu, including documentation from 1926 and 1932, and cross-examined defendants 1 and 2 (the plaintiff's daughters) regarding their respective shares in 12 jointly-held properties. The judgment affirms the plaintiff's entitlement to specific shares and confirms that defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to divide their portions without the plaintiff's objection, while establishing that relatives who converted to Christianity forfeited their inheritance rights in the Hindu joint family property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts