S.I of Police Surandai vs Kumar Advocate - Tr.R.Samy B.A.B.L. — 93/2021
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3of. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTS020073272025
Filing Number
101512/2025
Filing Date
28-Jan-2021
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
28-Jan-2021
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Surandai P.S
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.I of Police Surandai
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumar Advocate - Tr.R.Samy B.A.B.L.
-
2.Venkatesh
Adv. Tr.R.Samy B.A.B.L.
-
3.Kumar @ Thirumalaikumar
Adv. Tr.R.Samy B.A.B.L.
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document is a witness examination record (PW-1 testimony) from Criminal Court, Tenkaasi in case SC.No. 93/2021, dated February 9, 2026. The witness (37-year-old male from Riyathayipuram) testified that he has no knowledge of the accused persons or the case circumstances, and stated that police did not interrogate him. The document records his sworn statement rather than a final court order granting or denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2021
This document is a witness examination record (PW-1 testimony) from Criminal Court, Tenkaasi in case SC.No. 93/2021, dated February 9, 2026. The witness (37-year-old male from Riyathayipuram) testified that he has no knowledge of the accused persons or the case circumstances, and stated that police did not interrogate him. The document records his sworn statement rather than a final court order granting or denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts