State Government of Tamilnadu Inspector of Police., Surandai P.S. vs Arulraj alias Jebakumar alias KoliArul and 5 others Advocate - Tr.M.Maria Mathan Raja B.Sc.B.L. — 395/2024
Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 3(a),4(b),25(1-B)(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTS020068032025
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100999/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2024
Registration No
395/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government of Tamilnadu Inspector of Police., Surandai P.S.
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Arulraj alias Jebakumar alias KoliArul and 5 others Advocate - Tr.M.Maria Mathan Raja B.Sc.B.L.
Kannan (Abated)
Selvaraj (Abated)
Marimuthu
Adv. M.Balaganesh
RaJa @ Rocket Raja
Adv. Tr.K.Thanga Durai
Arul @ Nai Arul
Adv. Tr.D.Raja Prabhakaran B.A.,B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness examination records (affidavits under the Oaths Act, 1969) from Criminal Court, Tenkaasi in case SC.No. 395/2024, dated 10.03.2026. Four witnesses (PW-5 through PW-8) testified that they do not know the accused, have no knowledge of the case incident, and were not interrogated by police. No judicial order (bail, dismissal, or adjournment) is present in this document—it consists solely of witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness examination records (affidavits under the Oaths Act, 1969) from Criminal Court, Tenkaasi in case SC.No. 395/2024, dated 10.03.2026. Four witnesses (PW-5 through PW-8) testified that they do not know the accused, have no knowledge of the case incident, and were not interrogated by police. No judicial order (bail, dismissal, or adjournment) is present in this document—it consists solely of witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts