Inspector of Police Chokkampatti vs Esakkipandian and 7 others Advocate - M.MADASAMY — 443/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,341,342,427,294b,324,326,307,149. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-May-2026

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTS020067282025

Filing Number

100927/2025

Filing Date

17-Aug-2016

Registration No

443/2016

Registration Date

17-Aug-2016

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,341,342,427,294b,324,326,307,149
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Esakkipandian and 7 othersInspector of Police Chokkampatti
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Esakkipandian and 7 othersInspector of Police Chokkampatti
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Esakkipandian and 7 othersInspector of Police Chokkampatti
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police Chokkampatti

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Chokkampatti

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Esakkipandian and 7 others Advocate - M.MADASAMY

  2. 2.Thalaiyari Thangaraj

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  3. 3.Kaveri Subbiah pandian

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  4. 4.Kumar @ Thirumalai kumar

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  5. 5.sathish

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  6. 6.Ganesamoorthy

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  7. 7.Arumugasamy

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  8. 8.Singadurai

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

  9. 9.subbiah Pandian

    Adv. M.MADASAMY

Case History

  1. 20-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In this criminal case (S.C. No. 443/2016) dated 28.04.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of the witness (PW-3 Gurushanmugapriya) under Section 317 Cr.P.C. The witness testified about an alleged incident involving multiple accused persons, describing threats, violence, and an alleged attempt to cause harm. The court found the petition admissible and the witness examination was completed. The judgment concludes that the case is dismissed (ஈல்லை - dismissed). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Await Records

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 20-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 17-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 443/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this criminal case (S.C. No. 443/2016) dated 28.04.2026, the court recorded the cross-examination of the witness (PW-3 Gurushanmugapriya) under Section 317 Cr.P.C. The witness testified about an alleged incident involving multiple accused persons, describing threats, violence, and an alleged attempt to cause harm. The court found the petition admissible and the witness examination was completed. The judgment concludes that the case is dismissed (ஈல்லை - dismissed). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case