State, The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchadram vs Kaliappan and 3 others Advocate - Tr.J.ARAVIND MANIRAJ — 463/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 294(b), 506(2),. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTS020066862025

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6117/2025

Filing Date

19-09-2024

Registration No

463/2024

Registration Date

19-09-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 Section 294(b), 506(2),
TN PUBLIC PROPERTY (PRVNT.OF DAMAGE & LOSS) ACT, 1992 Section 3(1)
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State, The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchadram
MP/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State, The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchadram

Petitioner(s)

State, The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchadram

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Kaliappan and 3 others Advocate - Tr.J.ARAVIND MANIRAJ

Sivaprakasam

Adv. Tr.J.ARAVIND MANIRAJ

Rahu @ Sudalai Eesan

Adv. Tr.J.ARAVIND MANIRAJ

Raj Narayanan

Adv. Tr.K.Thanga Durai

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

20-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a witness affidavit (PW-2) recorded on 10.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi in Case No. SC.No.463/2024. Witness Veluchamy, a cable TV operator aged 55, testified that he resides in Thenthathadi and knows the accused and witness Krishnan, but has no knowledge of the case details and was not questioned by police. The document contains only the witness examination without a final court order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness affidavit (PW-2) recorded on 10.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi in Case No. SC.No.463/2024. Witness Veluchamy, a cable TV operator aged 55, testified that he resides in Thenthathadi and knows the accused and witness Krishnan, but has no knowledge of the case details and was not questioned by police. The document contains only the witness examination without a final court order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case