Equitas Small Fianance Bank Ltd. vs KUMAR — 1029/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section SEC 14. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 28th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS020053302025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-08-2025

Filing Number

4971/2025

Filing Date

18-08-2025

Registration No

1029/2025

Registration Date

08-09-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section SEC 14

Petitioner(s)

Equitas Small Fianance Bank Ltd.

Adv. SHENBAGA E

Respondent(s)

KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

28-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026

Enquiry

08-04-2026

Enquiry

10-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of secured agricultural property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 4.8 lakh loan. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank with police assistance if necessary, finding the bank's demand notice and subsequent possession notice were properly issued and published. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of secured agricultural property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 4.8 lakh loan. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank with police assistance if necessary, finding the bank's demand notice and subsequent possession notice were properly issued and published. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case