Karuppasamy vs Senthamaram P.S — 243/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS020007682026
Filing Number
766/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karuppasamy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Senthamaram P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a seized two-wheeler (Splendor+, Registration No. TN 79 M 3110) to the petitioner on bail with conditions, finding that the vehicle's RC book identifies the petitioner as the rightful owner and he had sold it to the accused over two years prior. The court applied the principle from *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*, directing the police to release the vehicle in judicial custody with a ₹50,000 bond and other protective conditions, rejecting the state's objection that the petitioner might dispose of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 243/2026
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a seized two-wheeler (Splendor+, Registration No. TN 79 M 3110) to the petitioner on bail with conditions, finding that the vehicle's RC book identifies the petitioner as the rightful owner and he had sold it to the accused over two years prior. The court applied the principle from *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*, directing the police to release the vehicle in judicial custody with a ₹50,000 bond and other protective conditions, rejecting the state's objection that the petitioner might dispose of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts