Karuppasamy vs Senthamaram P.S — 243/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS020007682026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
766/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Petitioner(s)
Karuppasamy
Respondent(s)
Senthamaram P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 24-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 18-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a seized two-wheeler (Splendor+, Registration No. TN 79 M 3110) to the petitioner on bail with conditions, finding that the vehicle's RC book identifies the petitioner as the rightful owner and he had sold it to the accused over two years prior. The court applied the principle from *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*, directing the police to release the vehicle in judicial custody with a ₹50,000 bond and other protective conditions, rejecting the state's objection that the petitioner might dispose of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a seized two-wheeler (Splendor+, Registration No. TN 79 M 3110) to the petitioner on bail with conditions, finding that the vehicle's RC book identifies the petitioner as the rightful owner and he had sold it to the accused over two years prior. The court applied the principle from *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*, directing the police to release the vehicle in judicial custody with a ₹50,000 bond and other protective conditions, rejecting the state's objection that the petitioner might dispose of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts