Chairman vs Pavoorchatram PS — 222/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS020007072026

Filing Number

705/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chairman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pavoorchatram PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a passenger auto (vehicle TN 76 Q 6472) seized in a criminal case under BNS Section 123 and COTPA Act Section 24(1), to the petitioner on bail with conditions. The court found that the actual vehicle owner had already transferred it to the petitioner through proper documentation before the alleged incident, making the seizure unjustified. The petitioner must post ₹2,00,000 bail, register the vehicle in his name within one month, and comply with other specified conditions including vehicle documentation and photographic records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tenkaasi ordered the temporary release of a passenger auto (vehicle TN 76 Q 6472) seized in a criminal case under BNS Section 123 and COTPA Act Section 24(1), to the petitioner on bail with conditions. The court found that the actual vehicle owner had already transferred it to the petitioner through proper documentation before the alleged incident, making the seizure unjustified. The petitioner must post ₹2,00,000 bail, register the vehicle in his name within one month, and comply with other specified conditions including vehicle documentation and photographic records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case