State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS vs IYYAPPAN — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTS020004632026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
462/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
670
Police Station
Tenkasi P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Tenkasi Police Station
Respondent(s)
IYYAPPAN
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 27-02-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Sulaiman in case CC 483/2018, finding him not guilty under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(2). The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the two main eyewitnesses (the complainant and his wife) provided contradictory testimony that severely undermined the government's case. The accused was consequently discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Sulaiman in case CC 483/2018, finding him not guilty under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(2). The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the two main eyewitnesses (the complainant and his wife) provided contradictory testimony that severely undermined the government's case. The accused was consequently discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts