State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS vs Prabakaran — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTS020004142026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
413/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Tenkasi P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Tenkasi Police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prabakaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Prabhakaran of charges under Section 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and threatening behavior beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the key prosecution witnesses gave conflicting and unreliable testimonies, insufficient to establish guilt with certainty, and therefore discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2026
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Prabhakaran of charges under Section 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and threatening behavior beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the key prosecution witnesses gave conflicting and unreliable testimonies, insufficient to establish guilt with certainty, and therefore discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts