State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS vs Prabakaran — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTS020004142026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
413/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Tenkasi P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector Of Police Tenkasi PS (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police Tenkasi Police Station
Respondent(s)
Prabakaran
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Copies
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 27-02-2026 | Copies |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Prabhakaran of charges under Section 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and threatening behavior beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the key prosecution witnesses gave conflicting and unreliable testimonies, insufficient to establish guilt with certainty, and therefore discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Tenkasi acquitted the accused Prabhakaran of charges under Section 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and threatening behavior beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the key prosecution witnesses gave conflicting and unreliable testimonies, insufficient to establish guilt with certainty, and therefore discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts