Suresh vs State Government by Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur PS — 2798/2025
Case under Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 15A(9), 18A, 4(2)(b), 4(2)(c). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 26th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010057262025
Filing Number
4300/2025
Filing Date
01-Nov-2025
Registration No
2798/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suresh
Adv. Tr. C. SureshKumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government by Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, directed that a fresh copy of the earlier order (dated 20.06.2025) be issued directly to the Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirement to register an FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that the previous order's non-compliance was due to procedural failure—it was addressed to higher authorities instead of the competent Station House Officer—and strictly directed the Inspector to comply with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Notice
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Notice
Principal District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2798/2025
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, directed that a fresh copy of the earlier order (dated 20.06.2025) be issued directly to the Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirement to register an FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that the previous order's non-compliance was due to procedural failure—it was addressed to higher authorities instead of the competent Station House Officer—and strictly directed the Inspector to comply with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts