Suresh vs State Government by Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur PS — 2798/2025

Case under Sc / St (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 15A(9), 18A, 4(2)(b), 4(2)(c). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 26th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010057262025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4300/2025

Filing Date

01-11-2025

Registration No

2798/2025

Registration Date

01-11-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

SC / ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 15A(9), 18A, 4(2)(b), 4(2)(c)

Petitioner(s)

Suresh

Adv. Tr. C. SureshKumar

Respondent(s)

State Government by Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

26-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Enquiry

10-03-2026

Enquiry

24-02-2026

Enquiry

17-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, directed that a fresh copy of the earlier order (dated 20.06.2025) be issued directly to the Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirement to register an FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that the previous order's non-compliance was due to procedural failure—it was addressed to higher authorities instead of the competent Station House Officer—and strictly directed the Inspector to comply with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, directed that a fresh copy of the earlier order (dated 20.06.2025) be issued directly to the Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, to ensure compliance with the mandatory requirement to register an FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that the previous order's non-compliance was due to procedural failure—it was addressed to higher authorities instead of the competent Station House Officer—and strictly directed the Inspector to comply with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case