Alagammal vs NIl — 133/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section8(2)(a)HinduMinorityandGuardianshipact. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTS010057092025
e-Filing Number
22-10-2025
Filing Number
1223/2025
Filing Date
01-Nov-2025
Registration No
133/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Alagammal
Adv. SUNDARESAN M
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIl
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 133/2025 (Alagammal) District and Sessions Court, Tenkasi | Date: 24.02.2026 The witness Essuraj provided sworn testimony regarding a land transaction involving a 50-cent property in Vellalalankundu village, valued at ₹5,00,000 per acre. The witness confirmed executing an affidavit and stated the property was sold for ₹3,25,000, though government valuation details were unknown. No cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded as a sworn deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 133/2025
Case Summary: 133/2025 (Alagammal) District and Sessions Court, Tenkasi | Date: 24.02.2026 The witness Essuraj provided sworn testimony regarding a land transaction involving a 50-cent property in Vellalalankundu village, valued at ₹5,00,000 per acre. The witness confirmed executing an affidavit and stated the property was sold for ₹3,25,000, though government valuation details were unknown. No cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded as a sworn deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts