Selvi vs Sankaran and 3 others Advocate - A.K.Karthick Kumar — 279/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS010049932024
Filing Number
805/2024
Filing Date
28-Oct-2024
Registration No
279/2024
Registration Date
08-Nov-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Selvi
Adv. Thiru.M.Karthikeyan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sankaran and 3 others Advocate - A.K.Karthick Kumar
-
2.P. Karuppaiya
Adv. A.K.Karthick Kumar
-
3.Muppudathi
-
4.Palavesam
Adv. A.K.Karthick Kumar
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary In this civil suit (OS No. 279/2024) from the Principal District Court, Tenkasi dated 10.03.2026, witness P.W.2 (Balamurugan) was recalled for cross-examination regarding a disputed jewelry claim. The court allowed the witness's cross-examination to continue, during which the witness testified about video recordings made without consent and disputed claims about 100 pounds of gold jewelry allegedly pledged by the defendant Balraj. The cross-examination revealed contradictions in the witness's earlier statements, and the court ultimately rejected the witness's evidence, finding the video recording inadmissible and the claims regarding the jewelry unsubstantiated—no re-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 279/2024
Summary In this civil suit (OS No. 279/2024) from the Principal District Court, Tenkasi dated 10.03.2026, witness P.W.2 (Balamurugan) was recalled for cross-examination regarding a disputed jewelry claim. The court allowed the witness's cross-examination to continue, during which the witness testified about video recordings made without consent and disputed claims about 100 pounds of gold jewelry allegedly pledged by the defendant Balraj. The cross-examination revealed contradictions in the witness's earlier statements, and the court ultimately rejected the witness's evidence, finding the video recording inadmissible and the claims regarding the jewelry unsubstantiated—no re-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts