State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS vs Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju — 20/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b) 351 (2) BNS. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTS010047022025

e-Filing Number

21-08-2025

Filing Number

3491/2025

Filing Date

29-Aug-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

423

Police Station

Sankarankoil Town P.S.,

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b) 351 (2) BNS
Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3 (1) (r)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  13. 09-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 29-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case