State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS vs Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju — 20/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b) 351 (2) BNS. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 07th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTS010047022025
e-Filing Number
21-08-2025
Filing Number
3491/2025
Filing Date
29-08-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
423
Police Station
Sankarankoil Town P.S.,
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 17-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts