State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS vs Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju — 20/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b) 351 (2) BNS. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 07th April 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTS010047022025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-08-2025

Filing Number

3491/2025

Filing Date

29-08-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

09-09-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

423

Police Station

Sankarankoil Town P.S.,

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b) 351 (2) BNS
SC / ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3 (1) (r)

Petitioner(s)

State Government by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Ananthakumar Advocate - R.Raju

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Appearance

17-03-2026

Appearance

10-03-2026

Appearance

10-02-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Order

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi accepted the police's final report classifying the case as a "mistake of fact," finding that Call Detail Records (CDR) evidence conclusively showed none of the parties—complainant, witness, or accused—were present at Sankarankovil on the alleged date of 03.01.2025; all were present only on 04.01.2025. The court rejected the complainant's objection petition as improperly formatted and lacking adequate grounds, but granted him liberty to file a fresh private complaint in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case