The Special District Revenue Officer (L.A), Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project II, Tiruchirappalli vs Nellaiyappan and 2 Others Advocate - Tr.R.Gobinath — 67/2024

Case under Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section 22(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTS010025632024

Filing Number

494/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

67/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section 22(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Special District Revenue Officer (L.A), Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project II, Tiruchirappalli

    Adv. GP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nellaiyappan and 2 Others Advocate - Tr.R.Gobinath

  2. 2.Narayanan

    Adv. R. Gobinath

  3. 3.Swarooparani

    Adv. Tr.Udhaya Arjun

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) case (LAO P. No. 67/2024) from the District Court, Tenkasi, dated February 5, 2026. The court affirmed findings regarding land acquisition proceedings for plot 423/2 in Aalangulam village, involving examination of sale deeds, wills, and documentation of multiple heirs across successive generations. The order confirms the distribution of compensation among the rightful heirs (parties 1, 2, and 3) at specified shares, with party 1 and 2 entitled to 1 share each and party 3 entitled to 3 shares, and directs payment accordingly under the Land Acquisition Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 03-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  21. 23-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  22. 25-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  23. 18-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  24. 04-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  26. 03-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  27. 05-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  28. 15-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  29. 10-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  30. 06-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  31. 05-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) case (LAO P. No. 67/2024) from the District Court, Tenkasi, dated February 5, 2026. The court affirmed findings regarding land acquisition proceedings for plot 423/2 in Aalangulam village, involving examination of sale deeds, wills, and documentation of multiple heirs across successive generations. The order confirms the distribution of compensation among the rightful heirs (parties 1, 2, and 3) at specified shares, with party 1 and 2 entitled to 1 share each and party 3 entitled to 3 shares, and directs payment accordingly under the Land Acquisition Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case