State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS vs Seetharaman Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani — 13/2025
Case under Sc / St (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 09th April 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNTS010024212025
Filing Number
1657/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
Kadayanallur P.S.,
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Seetharaman Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders |
| 24-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the complainants' objection petition and accepted the police's final report classifying the case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that independent witnesses contradicted allegations of caste-based abuse and criminal intimidation, and that the complainants failed to establish documentary proof of property ownership, determining the core dispute was civil in nature rather than criminal. The court directed the complainants to pursue their property rights claims in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the complainants' objection petition and accepted the police's final report classifying the case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that independent witnesses contradicted allegations of caste-based abuse and criminal intimidation, and that the complainants failed to establish documentary proof of property ownership, determining the core dispute was civil in nature rather than criminal. The court directed the complainants to pursue their property rights claims in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts