State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS vs Seetharaman Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani — 13/2025

Case under Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - Referred Charge Sheet

CNR: TNTS010024212025

Filing Number

1657/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

157

Police Station

Kadayanallur P.S.,

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Sc / St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va)
Indian Penal Code Section 447, 506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Seetharaman Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the complainants' objection petition and accepted the police's final report classifying the case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that independent witnesses contradicted allegations of caste-based abuse and criminal intimidation, and that the complainants failed to establish documentary proof of property ownership, determining the core dispute was civil in nature rather than criminal. The court directed the complainants to pursue their property rights claims in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  15. 19-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  16. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the complainants' objection petition and accepted the police's final report classifying the case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that independent witnesses contradicted allegations of caste-based abuse and criminal intimidation, and that the complainants failed to establish documentary proof of property ownership, determining the core dispute was civil in nature rather than criminal. The court directed the complainants to pursue their property rights claims in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case