State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS vs Ravikumar Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani — 10/2025
Case under Sc / St (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 11th April 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNTS010024182025
Filing Number
1654/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
11th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
535
Police Station
Kadayanallur P.S.,
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government by Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Ravikumar Advocate - Tr.G.Sudalaikani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Orders |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders |
| 24-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed the complainant's protest petition against the final investigation report classifying a caste-abuse case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that all material witnesses, including independent witnesses and the complainant's own relatives, consistently stated no such incident occurred on August 27, 2020, and the complainant failed to establish title to the disputed property. The court rejected requests for further investigation and to treat the petition as a private complaint, though permitted filing a fresh private complaint if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dismissed the complainant's protest petition against the final investigation report classifying a caste-abuse case as "Mistake of Fact." The court found that all material witnesses, including independent witnesses and the complainant's own relatives, consistently stated no such incident occurred on August 27, 2020, and the complainant failed to establish title to the disputed property. The court rejected requests for further investigation and to treat the petition as a private complaint, though permitted filing a fresh private complaint if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts