Sivasupramanian vs Inspector of Police, KV Nallur Ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 910/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010014932026
Filing Number
1188/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
910/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
Karivalamvanthanallur P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sivasupramanian
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAN B
-
2.Puliyuran
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAN B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, KV Nallur Ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 910/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed a bail petition by two accused (Sivasupramanian and Puliyuran) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 61(2), 103, and 351(3) for their alleged involvement in a brutal murder by sickle. The court declined bail despite the accused having been in custody for 17 days, citing the serious nature of the offense, evidence of conspiracy with co-accused, a history of prior violent incidents stemming from a family property dispute, and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 910/2026
Case 910/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed a bail petition by two accused (Sivasupramanian and Puliyuran) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 61(2), 103, and 351(3) for their alleged involvement in a brutal murder by sickle. The court declined bail despite the accused having been in custody for 17 days, citing the serious nature of the offense, evidence of conspiracy with co-accused, a history of prior violent incidents stemming from a family property dispute, and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts