Emarajan vs Inspector of Police, Alangulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 898/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010014892026
Filing Number
1185/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
898/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Alangulam P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Emarajan
Adv. S.Chandrabose
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Alangulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Emarajan v. Inspector of Police, Alangulam (Cr.M.P. 898/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Emarajan, arrested for possessing and selling 8.7 kg of prohibited cool lip tobacco near a school under the CAOTP Act and JJ Act. The court found the offence bailable under Section 27 of CAOTP Act and considered that property was recovered and the accused had undergone 16 days of incarceration. Bail was granted on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.5,000 fine to CM Relief Fund, and standard conditions against tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 898/2026
Case Summary: Emarajan v. Inspector of Police, Alangulam (Cr.M.P. 898/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi granted bail to Emarajan, arrested for possessing and selling 8.7 kg of prohibited cool lip tobacco near a school under the CAOTP Act and JJ Act. The court found the offence bailable under Section 27 of CAOTP Act and considered that property was recovered and the accused had undergone 16 days of incarceration. Bail was granted on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, Rs.5,000 fine to CM Relief Fund, and standard conditions against tampering with witnesses or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts