Jeyaraj vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, K.V.Nallur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 886/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010014722026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
1171/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
886/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Karivalamvanthanallur P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jeyaraj
Adv. P Mariselvan
-
2.Kadal alias kadalkani
Adv. P Mariselvan
-
3.Thangavel alias thangavelammal
Adv. P Mariselvan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, K.V.Nallur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 886/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Jeyaraj, Kadal, and Thangavel under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioners were accused of assaulting their brother and his wife with spade and aruval (sickle) on vital body parts during a water-fetching dispute, causing grievous injuries. Though the accused had no prior criminal record, the court refused bail citing the severity of injuries to vital body parts and the victim's continued hospitalization at the time of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 886/2026
Case Summary: 886/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Jeyaraj, Kadal, and Thangavel under Section 482 BNSS. The petitioners were accused of assaulting their brother and his wife with spade and aruval (sickle) on vital body parts during a water-fetching dispute, causing grievous injuries. Though the accused had no prior criminal record, the court refused bail citing the severity of injuries to vital body parts and the victim's continued hospitalization at the time of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts