Aravinth vs Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 877/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010014672026

Filing Number

1166/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

877/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

130

Police Station

Tenkasi P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aravinth

    Adv. Tr.T.Murugaiah Pandian

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Aravinth v. Inspector of Police, Tenkasi (Cr.M.P. 877/2026) The Tenkasi Sessions Court granted bail to Aravinth, who was arrested for posting a sword-wielding reel on Instagram that caused public panic, allegedly violating Arms Act Section 27(1), BNS Sections 192 and 352, and IT Act Section 67. The court considered his 18 days of incarceration, clean criminal record, and likely completion of investigation as grounds for release. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and conditions prohibiting witness tampering, absconding, and requiring cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 877/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Aravinth v. Inspector of Police, Tenkasi (Cr.M.P. 877/2026) The Tenkasi Sessions Court granted bail to Aravinth, who was arrested for posting a sword-wielding reel on Instagram that caused public panic, allegedly violating Arms Act Section 27(1), BNS Sections 192 and 352, and IT Act Section 67. The court considered his 18 days of incarceration, clean criminal record, and likely completion of investigation as grounds for release. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and conditions prohibiting witness tampering, absconding, and requiring cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case