Thirumalaikumar vs Police Department rep by SHO, Shencottah PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 875/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS010014602026
Filing Number
1160/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
875/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Shencottai P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thirumalaikumar
Adv. S.Palanikumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Department rep by SHO (Station House Officer), Shencottah PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 875/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Thirumalaikumar (and co-accused Rajeshkumar in a related petition) who were arrested for possession of 87.975 kg of prohibited tobacco products worth Rs. 46,920 under BNS Section 123 and CAOTP Act Sections 24(1) and 6(b). The court rejected bail despite the accused having no criminal history and having been in custody for 11 days, citing the large quantity of contraband involved and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 875/2026
Case 875/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi dismissed the bail petition of Thirumalaikumar (and co-accused Rajeshkumar in a related petition) who were arrested for possession of 87.975 kg of prohibited tobacco products worth Rs. 46,920 under BNS Section 123 and CAOTP Act Sections 24(1) and 6(b). The court rejected bail despite the accused having no criminal history and having been in custody for 11 days, citing the large quantity of contraband involved and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts