Lalitha vs Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Kadayanallur PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 883/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS010014512026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

1152/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

883/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

Kadayanallur P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lalitha

    Adv. Tamilmani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Department rep by Inspector of police, Kadayanallur PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Lalitha and her son Manikandan, arrested for possessing and selling 1.530 kgs of prohibited tobacco products near a school under the CAOTP Act and JJ Act. The court found the offences bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and considered they had spent 8 days in custody, ordering their release on Rs.10,000 bonds each with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for one month and Rs.2,000 each to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 883/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Lalitha and her son Manikandan, arrested for possessing and selling 1.530 kgs of prohibited tobacco products near a school under the CAOTP Act and JJ Act. The court found the offences bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and considered they had spent 8 days in custody, ordering their release on Rs.10,000 bonds each with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for one month and Rs.2,000 each to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case