SUNDARI vs RAVICAHDRAN Advocate - Thiru.M.I.Ramesh — 17/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3). Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Issue of Service Next hearing 14-Jul-2026

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTS010014432026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1145/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tenkasi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Surandai P.S

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARI

    Adv. Palani Devaram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVICAHDRAN Advocate - Thiru.M.I.Ramesh

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 17/2026 - Sundari v. Ravichandran The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed Sundari's petition to suspend her one-year imprisonment sentence for cheque dishonour (Section 138, Negotiable Instrument Act). She was convicted by the trial court and ordered to pay ₹3,00,000 compensation, but the appellate court found her appeal had arguable points and no prior criminal record. She is released on bail upon executing a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties and depositing ₹30,000 (10% of compensation) by 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 17/2026 - Sundari v. Ravichandran The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi allowed Sundari's petition to suspend her one-year imprisonment sentence for cheque dishonour (Section 138, Negotiable Instrument Act). She was convicted by the trial court and ordered to pay ₹3,00,000 compensation, but the appellate court found her appeal had arguable points and no prior criminal record. She is released on bail upon executing a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties and depositing ₹30,000 (10% of compensation) by 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case